Ambiguous Decisions in Bayesianism and Imprecise Probability | Radzvilas, Peden and De Pretis
Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden and Francesco De Pretis on whether imprecise beliefs lead to worse decisions under severe uncertainty
This author has yet to write their bio.Meanwhile lets just say that we are proud Elizabeth Hannon contributed a whooping 281 entries.
Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden and Francesco De Pretis on whether imprecise beliefs lead to worse decisions under severe uncertainty
Chris Smeenk reviews Accelerating Expansion, by Gordon Belot
Axel Constant on whether there are alternatives to reductionism in precision psychiatry
Richard Pettigrew reviews Right Belief and True Belief, by Daniel J Singer
Jamie Shaw on lotteries, biases, and affirmative action
The British Society for the Philosophy of Science has appointed a replacement for outgoing Co-Editor-in-Chief, Wendy Parker
Felipe De Brigard reviews The Entangled Brain, by Luiz Pessoa
Caspar Jacobs explains why the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures is wrong
Travis McKenna reviews Humean Laws for Human Agents, edited by Michael Townsen Hicks, Siegfried Jaag
and Christian Loew
Alex Thinius and Rose Trappes on how scientists construct sex as a binary and categorical variable