Elaine Landry, Categories for the Working Philosopher // Reviewed by Chris Kapulkin and Nicholas Teh
Chris Kapulkin and Nicholas Teh review Categories for the Working Philosopher, by Elaine Landry
This author has yet to write their bio.Meanwhile lets just say that we are proud Elizabeth Hannon contributed a whooping 281 entries.
Chris Kapulkin and Nicholas Teh review Categories for the Working Philosopher, by Elaine Landry
Adam Ferner reviews Everything Flows, by Nicholson and Dupré
It’s widely appreciated that contemporary philosophy of science, when done well, engages with actual scientific practices. Philosophers should not sit back (in armchairs, of course), consider what we think good science would look like, then inform scientists of our findings. Rather, current thinking goes, we should take seriously what scientists actually do, using these practices as the starting points for our philosophical accounts of the aims, processes, and products of science.
Marius Stan reviews The Deep Metaphysics of Space, by Edward Slowik
The BJPS is pleased to note that two of the papers it published last year have been included in The Philosopher’s Annual top ten papers of 2017. These papers have been made free to access, with links below.
Matteo Morganti reviews A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World, by Esfeld and Deckert
Tilman Sauer reviews Einstein, by Thomas Ryckman
Julia Göhner reviews Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, edited by Slater and Yudell
If you didn’t make it to this year’s BSPS annual conference in Oxford, we’ve teamed up with Philosophy Streaming to record the Presidential Address and the plenary discussions for your listening pleasure!
Rosenberg and Glymour review Actual Causality, by Joseph Y. Halpern