Esfeld and Deckert, A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World // Reviewed by Matteo Morganti
Matteo Morganti reviews A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World, by Esfeld and Deckert
This author has yet to write their bio.Meanwhile lets just say that we are proud Elizabeth Hannon contributed a whooping 276 entries.
Matteo Morganti reviews A Minimalist Ontology of the Natural World, by Esfeld and Deckert
Tilman Sauer reviews Einstein, by Thomas Ryckman
Julia Göhner reviews Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, edited by Slater and Yudell
If you didn’t make it to this year’s BSPS annual conference in Oxford, we’ve teamed up with Philosophy Streaming to record the Presidential Address and the plenary discussions for your listening pleasure!
Rosenberg and Glymour review Actual Causality, by Joseph Y. Halpern
Daniel J. Hicks reviews Exploring Inductive Risk, by Elliott and Richards
Joe Dewhurst reviews Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, by David M. Kaplan
Gregor Halfmann reviews Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition, edited by Caporael et al.
As any journal editor will tell you (at length, possibly via the medium of rant), the trickiest part of the job is not the papers, not the authors, and not even the typesetters. It’s the referees. It is no mean feat to secure referees who are, first, reliable in their academic judgement, second, responsive to emails, and third, willing to return reports when they say they will. But the frustrations of editors aside, the far more pressing concern is for the career prospects of early-career researchers. Jobs and funding can depend on timely decisions. Indeed, whether an early-career researcher gets to become a mid- or late-career researcher can depend on whether a decision is made in a reasonable amount of time.