Elliott and Richards, Exploring Inductive Risk // Reviewed by Daniel J. Hicks
Daniel J. Hicks reviews Exploring Inductive Risk, by Elliott and Richards
This author has yet to write their bio.Meanwhile lets just say that we are proud Elizabeth Hannon contributed a whooping 281 entries.
Daniel J. Hicks reviews Exploring Inductive Risk, by Elliott and Richards
Joe Dewhurst reviews Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, by David M. Kaplan
Gregor Halfmann reviews Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition, edited by Caporael et al.
As any journal editor will tell you (at length, possibly via the medium of rant), the trickiest part of the job is not the papers, not the authors, and not even the typesetters. It’s the referees. It is no mean feat to secure referees who are, first, reliable in their academic judgement, second, responsive to emails, and third, willing to return reports when they say they will. But the frustrations of editors aside, the far more pressing concern is for the career prospects of early-career researchers. Jobs and funding can depend on timely decisions. Indeed, whether an early-career researcher gets to become a mid- or late-career researcher can depend on whether a decision is made in a reasonable amount of time.
Matteo Colombo reviews Real Hallucinations, by Matthew Ratcliffe
Atoosa Kasirzadeh reviews Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge, by Boyer-Kassem et al.
Kerry McKenzie reviews Scientific Ontology, by Anjan Chakravartty
Carl F. Craver reviews The New Mechanical Philosophy, by Stuart Glennan
Steven F. Savitt reviews What Makes Time Special? by Craig Callender